2025/09/11

"I Feel like Stopping Everything": France's Equivalent of Charlie Kirk, Erik Tegnér, in Tears over the Death Threats He Has Received

 
Under the threats of leftist thugs, "I have myself felt like stopping" admits Nicolas Conquer on Europe 1 (at 5:52-6:33 and 12:22-13:41 in the video above, at 7:00-7:44 in the video below). "But after the shock and the disbelief, I must take up the flame." And the ROF spokesman predicts an army of Charlie Kirks.

The main guest was France's equivalent of Charlie — he is an outspoken conservative who started the magazine Frontières in addition to being of the same age and a declared admirer of Charlie Kirk who interviewed him last summer and was in talks to invite the TPUSA founder to a debate at La Sorbonne. But now Erik Tegnér confesses that he is scared and that he "feels like stopping everything."

"I thought of President Washington praying in the snow for the sake of America": Where I was on Sept. 11th


A day after Charlie Kirk was brutally gunned down at an event to promote debate, discussion, and a measure of harmony with people who have nothing but contempt for America and Western values, it is time to commemorate the anniversary of 9-11.

In that perspective, we bring you the reminiscences of a woman who had moved to Washington just two weeks before the 911 attacks. Edy Iversen Martin-Prevel was a former Public Affairs director in Washington DC. She currently works in Paris, France, as an Ambassador for Peace. 

Where I was on September 11th 

by Edy Iversen 

Starting Over 
Edy Iversen 
September 2002 

On March 3rd, 2002, I commemorated the one-year anniversary of the death of my beloved husband Tom. There is not a day or a minute that goes by that I do not think of him or am reminded of his tender loving character. More than anything else the death of someone you love teaches you about the incredible value of your own life. 

You can no longer take for granted even one moment. Small insignificant things make you weep uncontrollably. The littlest kindness can render you inconsolable for hours. You can never watch the news again with the same eyes. War tears your heart out. Even disciplining your children becomes almost impossible. You want to give them everything just to take the pain away from their heart.

In spite of the agony and loneliness of death, life goes on and so must you. It is actually a time of tremendous opportunity for many people if only they can realize it and can go beyond their sadness. It is a second chance in life and time for a new beginning.

In the past because of marriage and children, we are many times forced to sacrifice our own personal God given gifts to raise our children, to pay the bills and to take care of the ones we love. But death is a tremendous opportunity to re-create that someone we somehow neglected for a long time and that is ourselves.

When my husband died, I was so overwhelmed with grief I could barely function. He was my whole world. Everything I looked at reminded me of him. It was unbearable. I got down on my knees and asked God, what next? How can I pick myself up from this misery and go forward? And I heard a voice that said, "Go to Washington D.C."

Though I had worked in DC several times over the past 17 years it was usually just for a special event and only for a couple of days at a time. But to move my whole life, future and son to an unknown place, especially a huge city full of traffic, seemed impossible to me. I had spent the last seventeen years in two small towns in South Dakota and Florida where my worst fear was hitting a deer or a senior citizen crossing the road. Yet, I knew it was fate. So, to the disbelief of family and friends, I followed my intuition and off I went with my fourteen-year-old son and began a new chapter of my life.

I realized when I got here that God had prepared everything for me already. I found a very nice home in Maryland that I could share with a woman whose husband was working overseas temporarily. Her daughter also was the leader of our church youth group. Within weeks our home became "teenage central" to the joy and delight of my son. He was adopted into a household of friends almost overnight. We also found a great school with a baseball coach who took a special liking to my son. He helped in so many ways to encourage him to go on with his life after losing his best buddy, his father. I found a job in Public Relations in the non-profit sector. This included working at the Capitol and organizing major conferences for leaders in the DC area.

Less than two weeks after my arrival in Washington, the Pentagon was almost destroyed, and the Twin Towers were decimated. I was terrified. Who wasn’t? But more than fear for my own life, I was scared for the life of my country and important leaders that were sacrificing their own lives every day to maintain the freedoms we cherish here. I knew I had to do something to protect our nation.

In the chill of winter, I went to the Capitol every day with my handy legislative directory and prayed at the steps of the halls of Congress. I read the biographies of our legislators and leaders. As I prayed over each picture my teardrops kissed their faces.

The past had provided me with the incredible opportunity to work with so many conscientious Congressman and woman over the years. The thought of anything happening to the leaders of this country and our historic Capitol was unfathomable to me. In spite of the media hype, I had oftentimes seen firsthand the selflessness of our elected officials, their overburdened schedules, the public sacrifices of their families and personal lives to insure the preservation of the "land of the free and home of the brave". In one fell swoop of terror everything could be lost.

On New Year’s Day, I went to the White House, stood behind it’s iron gates and besieged God for the protection of our President, his family and our nation. I heard somewhere that God cannot deny the tears of a mother’s heart. I thought of President Washington praying in the snow for the sake of America, having only an army of beaten and defeated men. So much blood, sweat and tears had been shed for this country. I felt so helpless as did most Americans. This was all I could think to do to personally stop this reign of terror.

Within four months of my relocation, I helped to coordinate three major historic conferences. The first was an Interreligious and International Conference that brought over 450 world leaders together from different nations and different religions for the sake of Global Peace. The highlight of the conference was a beautiful bridge ceremony between warring countries and leaders. To see a very important Israeli Rabbi and a Muslim Imam embrace with tears gave hope to even the most cynical of the group and provided a vision that peace can be a reality in our lifetime.

Next, I worked on a series of International Leadership Conferences that were conducted in almost every state in America. These brought together leaders to work for the sake of peace. At the conferences we appointed 120 Ambassadors for Peace to work on the social and moral problems of each individual state.

And finally, I found myself in the midst of organizing a prayer luncheon for the current global situation with over 150 religious leaders of all faiths praying together for the sake of the world. I felt my husband looking down and smiling from Heaven when I was working on this event and I knew his spirit was with me. It was a profound experience. 

All this happened after thinking my life was over when my husband died? What possibly could be worth living for after someone you love is gone? I guess the powers that be knew something I didn’t. I realized that in spite of my own tragedy, there was a suffering greater than mine and that somehow through trying to alleviate the misery of God, my heart could be healed in the process. 

Sometimes suffering can be a great friend and teacher if you don’t let it embitter you. It can be the catalyst to bring you to a higher and deeper place and to realize who you really are and what you are made of. In the process, I have developed a new level of gratitude, hope and patience. And I look on my "so-called" life as a new beginning to be able to contribute in a way I never could before. 

Recently I saw a little boy in a wheelchair with a crippling disease who wrote beautiful poetry. Even in the midst of pain he could still give and comfort others. I have learned by giving to others, the pain grows less and less each day. I am a peace now with my loss, because through it I have gained much more than I ever realized. A year ago, I could never imagine I would smile again, laugh or think of anyone else but myself. But little by little I am finding my way. If you too are walking this lonely road, I reach out my hand and heart to you. One day the pain will lessen, and the sun’s warmth will reach you again. It is true that "when God closes the door, he opens the window". And I thank him for that. 

Luckily, I have also had the help of a personal coach and counselor to help overcome the grief. This has been very beneficial for me, and I highly suggest reaching out for this kind of help. Going beyond the death of someone you love is not easy, but standing still and settling for desperate loneliness or misery will never allow you or the person whom you lost to be happy. For the sake of the person you loved, go forward, find joy and take their spirit with you on the path, as it is only a matter of time when you will meet once again.

NB: While we're fighting to recover No Pasarán from Google's pernicious and gratuitous ban, I am blogging here, at No Pasarán's sister blog. 

RIP Charlie Kirk: This Is What Is Bound to Happen When You Constantly Refer to Your Adversaries as "Fascists" and as "Threats to Democracy"


What a day to commemorate 9-11, the day after Charlie Kirk was brutally gunned down at an event to promote debate, discussion, and a measure of harmony with the Left.

This is what happens, this is what is bound to happen, when you constantly refer to your adversaries as fascists, as Nazis, as #racists — i.e., as monsters; as subhuman devils. 

Doesn’t #Adolf Hitler, don’t (existential) threats to democracy, don’t #domestic #TERRORISTS, deserve to be silenced (disregarded, emasculated, banned, removed from polite society, made to #shutup, taken down, gunned down)? 

This is precisely the very reason for the need for @charliekirk11 and for the @TPUSA (see also @benshapiro, @michaeljknowles, @andrewklavan, et al) to go around to #Leftist bastions and try to talk people young and old out of the #HateSpeech (far more insidious than that that @POTUS @realDonaldTrump and other #Republicans are routinely accused of) that they have been indoctrinated into by deranged leftist teachers, leftist #Medias, and leftist political parties (i.e., @TheDemocrats), referred to by Abraham Lincoln as the “fire-eaters” and the “locofocos” (thanks for the Instalink, Sarah).

Incidentally (not): The #Assassination of #TPUSA's Charlie Kirk doesn’t prove that #guncontrol is necessary. On the contrary: The scathing hatred for a substantial part of the citizenry, indeed for a majority of the U.S, population, proves the need, and the raison d’être, of the #2ndAmendment from the very beginning of the Republic… 

RIP #CharlieKirk 
You valiantly stepped forward into the fight 
You boldly stepped into the Light
Prayers for your family 
— your wife, your kids, 
your parents, & beyond 

Via Powerline

Update: "My liberal friends are completely oblivious about how radicalizing the last week has been for tens of millions of normal Americans; Zero clue" by Robert Sterling

• Charlie Kirk and the Glorification of Terrorism: "broadcast outlets did their best to hide the obvious connection between the shooter and the left’s obsession that everyone on the right is 'fascist'"

• If someone suggests using a Nazi concentration camp for their opponents, aren't they in fact the actual… Nazis?

NB: While we're fighting to recover No Pasarán from Google's unwarranted ban of a blog of 21 years with 14,000 posts, I am blogging here, at No Pasarán's sister blog.
 

Update: The following day, Republicans Overseas France issued a statement honoring the 24th anniversary of Sept 11, as well as the life of the founder of Turning Point USA.  Randy Yaloz and Paul Reen:

The USA is so politically polarized that we can no longer express political differences and opinions in a respectful, peaceful manner. The freedom of speech, which has always been the bedrock of American Society, is at risk today because of intolerance and hatred. Charlie Kirk, the strongest and most important young voice in the Conservative Republican MAGA movement, was assassinated. Although as of this writing, the shooter is not yet apprehended, it is clear [that contrary to MSM reports that the shooter's motives are unknown,] the assassin was a left-wing intolerant person who was filled with hatred towards Charlie and his Christian conservative values. Hatred fueled by years of dehumanizing Republicans by Democrat Leaders, and Democrat supported media and academics.

Charlie was murdered doing what he loves - speaking to thousands at an American University and debating students that didn't agree with him, in a non-violent and respectful manner. Charlie was an example for everyone. He was a loving husband and father with strong Christian values, he was a brave patriot who loved his country and tried to improve humanity, he was a gifted debater and was respectful of people with opposing views. Charlie and Republicans are not fascists, Nazis, racists, misogynists, transphobes or any type of phobe nor "threats to Democracy", as taught to kids over the past two decades.

Words have consequences. We pray for Charlie's wife, children, family and close friends. Republicans Overseas France will not let him die in vain and will continue to speak truth and express our conviction in a respectful and peaceful way. 

We Are Charlie. 

2025/09/10

No, "No Pasarán" Is Not a Pro-Communist Blog and Never Was; On the Contrary, Its Mission Is to Denounce Anti-Americans of All Stripes

As the blogosphere rallies in support of ¡No Pasarán!'s restoration to the Internet, some commenters have misunderstood the very title of the blog, going as far as to wonder whether, based on its title (“They shall not pass” or "None shall pass", aligned with the Left during the Spanish Civil War), ¡No Pasarán! isn't a pro-communist blog or even a communist blog.

The short answer is No (or, in Spanish, "¡No!") — not at all. On the contrary: thumbing its nose at leftists, the blog's raison d'être is to denounce anti-Americans of all stripes — domestic as well as foreign.

Certainly, if you are familiar with the blog's banner, you would agree that it is highly unlikely that a (pro-)communist would ridicule the famous photo of Che Guevara by having El Che (or, as we called the Dissident Frogman's doctored photo, Mi-Che) wear Mickey Mouse ears on the top of his noggin. 

In keeping with the cheeky and irreverent element, recall that "None shall pass" is also the motto of the black knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail (although we hope to have been more successful than John Cleese).

The blog was born in 2004 — when a number of ex-pats living in France (mainly Paris), most of them on the right, one single left-leaning member, grew increasingly outraged over the amount of anti-Americanism in French media and French society rising in spite of (or because of) the horrendous attacks on 911; and continuing with the George W Bush decision to invade Iraq in order to remove Saddam Hussein. They adopted the slogan: This (i.e., this anti-Americanism, French or other) will not go unanswered. 

Having said that, here is some historical background: Although best remembered as the war cry of the Spanish republicans (sic — a misnomer if there ever was one; actually a mix of socialists and communists) against Franco’s army during the Civil War in the 1930s, the origin of “They shall not pass” or "None shall pass" actually has nothing to do with communism or any political leaning.

It was purely military, originating a generation earlier when the French poilus in World War I made a vow regarding the German invaders, notably at Verdun: “Ils ne passeront pas!”

And No Pasarán has never shied from telling the atrocious truth about leftists, in Spain, in France, in America, or anywhere else. (Indeed, that is (was?) the blog's raison d'être.) As Paul Johnson put it, 

Throughout the Spanish war, Stalinism was assisted not only by superb public relations but by naivety, gullibility and, it must also be said, the mendacity and corruption of Western intellectuals.

That was from a No Pasarán post on Victims of Communism (!) Day (May 1) in 2024, "In Spain in 1937 and 1938, many thousands of Leftists of all descriptions, were executed or tortured to death in Communist prisons (one who escaped was George Orwell)."

2025/09/09

David Brooks explains Why the New York Times Columnist that He Is Is Not a Liberal


As  shares his insights into Mass Migration and Liberalism’s Fall, as  suggests that the term ‘African American’ be dropped in favor of ‘Black’ once and for all, and as an Obama speechwriter wonders whether it isn't time to stop snubbing your right-wing family — what surprises from the New York Times! —  explains Why I Am Not a Liberal:

Just write people checks.

This is consistent with something I’ve noticed all my life — the materialist bent of progressive thought: the assumption that material conditions drive history, not cultural or moral ones. … Progressives have often argued that improving schools is mostly about spending more money, that crime is mostly the product of material deprivation.

 … [Liberal] Thinkers like Irving Kristol and Nathan Glazer had been poor immigrant kids. They were willing to spend money to fight poverty, but they wanted the programs to nurture the values that they had seen firsthand help people rise: hard work, family and community cohesion, reliability, a passionate commitment to education. These values tend to inhere in communities before they are transmitted to individuals.

Progressives, by contrast, are quick to talk about money but slow to talk about the values side of the equation. That’s in part for the best of reasons. They don’t want to blame the victims or contribute to the canard that people are poor because they are lazy.

 … Human agency disappears if research subjects are reduced to a bunch of variables that can be correlated. People who overly rely on social science knowledge are going to tend to focus on money because it can be counted more easily than culture. People who rely on government to solve problems will tend to overemphasize the power of money because that’s the thing government most easily controls. 

 … Populism is not primarily economic; it’s about respect, values, national identity and many other things. All that spending [that Joe Biden's team threw at problems] did not win anybody over [to the Democrat Party]. 

 … Today most of our problems are moral, relational and spiritual more than they are economic. There is the crisis of disconnection, the collapse of social trust, the loss of faith in institutions, the destruction of moral norms in the White House, the rise of amoral gangsterism around the world.

I’ve been driven away from the right over the past decade, but I can’t join the left because I just don’t think that tradition of thought grasps reality in all its fullness. 

 … If you can find some lefties who are willing to spend money fighting poverty but also willing to promote the traditional values and practices that enable people to rise, you can sign me up for the revolution.

For Blacks in America, the African connection is too long ago: It’s Time to Let Go of ‘African-American’


You may remember that after meeting with the sisters Diamond and Silk, Donald Trump reported the revelation that amongst themselves, blacks never refer to themselves as African American.

Well, it turns out that a liberal-leaning African-American — I mean a liberal-leaning black man — is in total agreement and the linguist writes as much in the New York Times. Declaring that It’s Time to Let Go of ‘African American’,  goes on to ask "Why not just say what we mean?"

The problem [with African American] is that the term appeared on [Zohran Mamdani's college] application, or anywhere else. Plenty of Black people have never liked it, and ever more are joining the ranks. It’s time to let it go.

“African American” entered mainstream circulation in the late ’80s as a way to call attention to Black people’s heritage in the same way that terms like “Italian American” and “Asian American” do for members of those groups. The Rev. Jesse Jackson encouraged its usage, declaring: “Black does not describe our situation. In my household there are seven people and none of us have the same complexion. We are of African American heritage.” In 1989 the columnist and historian Roger Wilkins told Isabel Wilkerson: “Whenever I go to Africa, I feel like a person with a legitimate place to stand on this earth. This is the name for all the feelings I’ve had all these years.”

Since that time, the United States has seen an enormous change in immigration patterns. In 1980 there were about 200,000 people in America who were born in Africa; by 2023 there were 2.8 million. So today, for people who were born in Africa, any children they have after moving here and Black people whose last African ancestors lived centuries ago, the term “African American” treats them as if they are all in the same category, forcing a single designation for an inconveniently disparate range of humans.

Further complicating matters is that many Africans now living here are not Black. White people from, for example, South Africa or Tanzania might also legitimately call themselves African American. 

 … A term that is meant to be descriptive but that can refer to Cedric the Entertainer, Trevor Noah, Elon Musk and Zohran Mamdani is a little silly. 

And not just silly but chilly. “African American” sounds like something on a form. Or something vaguely euphemistic, as if you’re trying to avoid saying something out loud. It feels less like a term for the vibrant, nuanced bustle of being a human than like seven chalky syllables bureaucratically impervious to abbreviation. Italian Americans call themselves “Italian” for short. Asian Americans are “Asian.” But for any number of reasons, it’s hard to imagine a great many Black Americans opting to call themselves simply African.

To the extent that “African American” was designed to change perceptions of what “Black” means, it hasn’t worked. The grand old euphemism treadmill has done it in. Again and again we create new terms hoping to get past negative associations with the old ones, such as “homeless” for “bum.” But after a while the negative associations settle like a cloud of gnats on the new terms as well, and then it’s time to find a further euphemism.

 … But all along we’ve had a perfectly good word to describe Black people: Black. We should just use that.

Black power! Yeah. But African American power? 

 … “Black is beautiful.” Yes. Truly, “African American” isn’t.


While  explains Why I Am Not a Liberal, while  shares his insights into Mass Migration and Liberalism’s Fall, and while an Obama speechwriter wonders whether it isn't time to stop snubbing your right-wing family — leading one to wonder whether the New York Times is getting a modicum of common sense — 's article, It’s Time to Let Go of ‘African American’, leads to the associate professor of linguistics at Columbia University being invited to a debate with David Leonhardt (p) regarding "the politics of how we talk about race and identity and discuss whether “Latinx” is a thing."

David Leonhardt: … Can you summarize for me the background and the history of the debate between African American and Black?

John McWhorter: … In 1988, when the Rev. Jesse Jackson had a massive influence on the Black community, he basically declared that we need to start calling ourselves African Americans rather than Black, because Black was too crude and general to capture all the different shades that we are.

And I think the idea also was that to add the African part was to give a note of pride, a note of heritage. And so it happened very quickly. If you were alive and mature at the time, it was as if all of a sudden one week you were supposed to say African American rather than Black.

I never much liked it. I didn’t rail against it, but it never felt right to me because I’m Black. I’m a Black American, but to me the African connection is too long ago. It’s too abstract. It didn’t feel right. Italian American is one thing. Your mother, your grandmother speaks Sicilian, and you’re eating Italian food and you have a certain way of talking. There’s a whole culture.

Black American culture is not African in that way. It’s Black American. But time has gone by and the problem is that the term “African American” has become so awkward that it was time to start asking some questions. Because back in 1988, there weren’t nearly as many immigrants from Africa in the United States as now. That number has truly skyrocketed.

And so it’s at the point where — well, what about the African Americans who are like Italian Americans, where Africa is just a generation or two away? You speak one of the languages or you halfway speak it. In other words, you are [truly] an African American person. Is that person really the same thing as Eddie Murphy or me? And it was time to start asking some questions.

 … Leonhardt: Well, if we’re going to talk about uncomfortable linguistic subjects, we have to talk about Latinx, which has had a little boomlet of becoming a symbol of how parts of the progressive left, particularly the academic elite progressive left, have become out of touch with parts of America. … 

So how did we end up with the phrase “Latinx,” John? And how do you think about it?

McWhorter: That is a very 2010s thing. I remember first hearing it at Columbia from students around 2014. And I thought, OK, it’s clever. It avoids the gender binary.

But the simple truth is it’s been a long time now, and very few actual Latinos are ever going to embrace the term. Partly because X is awkward. It’s not very aesthetically pleasing given that Spanish words so often end in vowels, which the human ear likes. Then, more to the point, there are an awful lot of Latinos who don’t want to get rid of the gender binary. That is, however you feel about it, generally a minority opinion among human beings.

That means that it’s highly imposed, but I’m not angry about “Latinx” the way many people are because I live in a very Latino neighborhood in New York and I hear Spanish daily. I have never heard a single person ever use it.

  … Leonhardt: … Democrats thought if we enact a more and more and more open border policy, as Joe Biden did, we will win more Latino support. In fact, the opposite happened because when you look at actual public opinion, Latinos have views on immigration, much as they have views on “Latinx,” that look much more like American society as a whole, and not like the views of academics that you are hanging out with presumably, John, at faculty meetings.

McWhorter: [laughs] One of the hardest things for humanities and social science academics is that they are often under an understandable and sincere impression that their views on matters like on what Latinos should be called, on immigration, on frankly any social issue, are truth rather than an opinion.

 … Leonhardt: And maybe to be a little bit mischievous, I would say the last item on the McWhorter doctrine is don’t confuse arguments that you hear coming from academia with views that are widely held among the American public. Maybe they are, but there’s a good chance that they are not.

McWhorter: [laughs] That makes me sound so disloyal to what I think of as my tribe, but I’d have to come clean and say yes.




2025/09/08

Obama Speechwriter Wonders Whether It Isn't Time to Stop Snubbing Your Right-Wing Family?


Is the New York Times getting a modicum of common sense? As explains Why I Am Not a Liberal, as  shares his insights into Mass Migration and Liberalism’s Fall, and as  suggests that the term ‘African American’ be dropped in favor of ‘Black’, there is push-back even at the Gray Lady at one of liberalism's most (in)famous (and most appalling and utterly vile) ideas — that to punish one's own family (often the older generation) for supporting Adolf Hitler and the Nazis, uh, for supporting George W Bush and the neocons, for supporting Donald Trump and the conservatives, the (adult) offspring — proudly — break off all contact with the (grand-)parents.

Now, a speechwriter for Barack Obama asks whether it isn't Time to Stop Snubbing Your Right-Wing Family, pointing out that "ostracism might just hurt the ostracizer more than the ostracizee." Having said that, it is nigh impossible to find a comment among the 620+ in the Times that does not disagree — worse, that does not show disgust — with 's light-hearted article.

Furthermore, as Dennis Prager pointedly mentioned more than a few times over the years, there are few things more cruel than to deny parents the pleasure and grand-parents the right to visit with their children (i.e., with the "tolerant" leftists themselves) and with their grand-children (i.e., with the "tolerant" leftists' own kids). "There are people who call my show, tell me they have never met their grand-children" bewails the head of PragerU. Indeed, what turns into a feel-good piece, Dennis Prager calls a terrible crisis in America.

 
Let's turn to Obama Speechwriter :

Not too long ago, I felt a civic duty to be rude to my wife’s younger brother, Matt Kappler.

I met him in 2012, and it was immediately clear we had nothing in common. He lifted weights to death metal; I jogged to Sondheim. I was one of President Barack Obama’s speechwriters and had an Ivy League degree; he was a huge Joe Rogan fan and went on to get his electrician’s license. My early memories of Matt are hazy; I was mostly trying to impress his parents. Still, we got along, chatting amiably on holidays and at family events.

Then the pandemic hit, and our preferences began to feel like more than differences in taste. We were on opposite sides of a cultural civil war. The deepest divide was vaccination. I wasn’t shocked when Matt didn’t get a Covid shot. But I was baffled. Turning down a vaccine during a pandemic seemed like a rejection of science and self-preservation. It felt as though he was tearing up the social contract that, until that point, I’d imagined we shared.

Had Matt been a friend rather than a family member, I probably would have cut off contact. 

 … My frostiness wasn’t personal. It was strategic. Being unfriendly to people who turned down the vaccine felt like the right thing to do. How else could we motivate them to mend their ways?

I wasn’t the only one thinking this. A 2021 essay for USA Today declared, “It’s time to start shunning the ‘vaccine hesitant.’” A Los Angeles Times piece went further, arguing that to create “teachable moments,” it may be necessary to mock some anti-vaxxers’ deaths.

Shunning as a form of accountability goes back millenniums. … 

But that was before social media. We live in a world of online fandoms, choose-your-own-adventure information and parasocial relationships. Few people who lost friends over the vaccine changed their minds. They just got new friends. Those exiled from one version of society were quickly welcomed by another — an alternate universe full of grievance peddlers and conspiracy theorists who thrived on stories of victimized conservatives.

 … No one is required to spend time with people he or she doesn’t care for. But those of us who feel an obligation to shun strategically need to ask: What has all this banishing accomplished? It’s not just ineffective. It’s counterproductive.

These days, ostracism might just hurt the ostracizer more than the ostracizee.

 … When I share stories about surfing with my brother-in-law, people often tell me about relationships in their lives pushed to the brink by politics. Sometimes, they’re proud of ties they severed. More often, they’re hoping for a way forward. How can we pierce bubbles of misinformation? Can friendships fractured in the Trump era be repaired? 

 … When we cut off contacts or let algorithms sort us into warring factions, we forget that not so long ago we used to have things to talk about that didn’t involve politics. Shunning plays into the hands of demagogues, making it easier for them to divide us and even, in some cases, to incite violence.

There are, of course, some people so committed to odiousness that it defines them. … In an age when banishment backfires, keeping the door open to unlikely friendship isn’t a betrayal of principles; it’s an affirmation of them.


2025/09/07

Powerline on the fate of the disappeared site No Pasarán: "Something out of a real life Biden-era horror movie"


Over at Powerline, readers of the blog are warned that the fate of 

the disappeared site ¡No Pasarán! … sounds like something out of the real life Biden-era horror movie.

Scott Johnson proceeds to quote the message of a long-time follower of Power Line who wrote him about the matter — and to whom we are exceedingly grateful.(Also thanks to Ed for the Instalink.) Consultant Damian Bennett, an old old friend of ours, proceeds to list eight bullet points concerning Google's "ham-fisted censorship" while asking Power Line to share the links below with its readers:

At Bēhance: Restore ¡No Pasarán!

At Le Monde Watch: BE TANK MAN! Join The Fight To “Restore No Pasarán” To The Blogosphere.

Until ¡No Pasarán! is restored, Owner/Publisher Erik Svane can be found blogging at Le Monde Watch.

Glenn Reynolds has deplored the suppression of ¡No Pasarán! in posts that can be found here.

In addition, also thanks to Doug Ross and Republicans Overseas France for their support.

2025/09/06

"Merkel’s calamitous decision": Whether in Europe or America, mass migration without express legislative consent is politically intolerable; and migrants ought to be expected to accept, not reject, the values of the host country


It’s been 10 years since Angela Merkel, as German chancellor, memorably declared “Wir schaffen das” — “We can do this” — in the face of the mass migration crisis sweeping Europe.

Will America's Democrat Party ("the world’s most clueless of all major political parties today") listen? Will Europe's élites? Over at the New York Times, one of its rare columnists who does not seem to be a far-left liberal lunatic has written Mass Migration and Liberalism’s Fall.  goes on to refer to his discussion of liberal democracy's two half-siblings, postliberal democracy and preliberal democracy. 

Last week The Wall Street Journal reported, “For the first time, populist or far-right parties are leading the polls in the U.K., France and Germany.” Similar parties are already in power or in government in Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden, to say nothing of the United States.

To say the West’s turn to the anti-immigrant right was the predictable result of Merkel’s calamitous decision to open Germany’s borders does not mean there aren’t still lessons to be learned from it — not least by the world’s most clueless of all major political parties today, the Democratic Party.

 … [In contrast to preliberal democracy,] Postliberal democracy … embraces the values of liberalism but tries to insulate itself from the will of the people. The European Union, with its vast architecture of transnational legislation, is one example of postliberalism; international courts, issuing rulings where they have no jurisdiction, are another; global environmental accords, like the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement (signed by the Obama administration but never ratified by Congress), are a third.

 … Merkel never sought the approval of German voters to relax the country’s immigration laws and take in nearly a million people over the space of a year. Americans didn’t elect President Joe Biden on any promise to let in millions of migrants over the southern border [*]. Post-Brexit Britons never thought they’d bring in an astounding 4.5 million immigrants to a country of just 69 million between 2021 and 2024 — under Tory leaders, no less.

No wonder the reaction to years of postliberal governance has been a broad turn to its preliberal opposite. Not all right-wing populist parties are the same, and there are meaningful differences between, say, the ill-disguised fascism of the Alternative for Germany and the pragmatic conservatism of Giorgia Meloni, Italy’s prime minister. But all of them have risen on the same core complaint: that postliberal governments used obscure legal mechanisms or simply ignored the law to attempt a social transformation without society’s explicit consent. In America, it’s called replacement theory.

Liberals and progressives typically dismiss replacement theory as antisemitic, racist demagoguery, and no doubt there are plenty of bigots who believe it. But maybe some measure of understanding ought to be extended to ordinary voters who merely wonder why they should be made to feel like unwelcome outsiders in parts of their own country or asked to pay a share of their taxes for the benefit of newcomers they never agreed to welcome in the first place or extend tolerance to those who don’t always show tolerance in return or be told to shut their mouths over some of the more shocking instances of migrant criminality.

What most of these voters are feeling isn’t racism. It’s indignation at having their normal and appropriate political concerns dismissed as racism. And as long as politicians and pundits of the traditional political establishment treat them as racists, the far right is going to continue to rise and flourish.

There’s something partisans of the center-right and center-left could do: Instead of discreetly murmuring that, say, Merkel or Biden got immigration policy wrong or that it was morally and economically right but politically foolish, they can grasp the point that control over borders is a sine qua non of national sovereignty, that mass migration without express legislative consent is politically intolerable, that migrants ought to be expected to accept, not reject, the values of the host country and that hosts should not be expected to adapt themselves to values at odds with a liberal society.

* If indeed, they, or a majority of them, did vote for Sleepy Joe in the 2020 election at all.

2025/09/02

BE TANK MAN! Join the Fight to "Restore No Pasarán" to the Blogosphere


Following the publication of the post "DEAR READERS — A Request To Help Spread The Word On Google Banning the Blog No Pasarán", I am — deeply — indebted to our ol' pal Damian Bennett who did just that — investing more than any other person that I know of — spending countless hours (days?) creating posters over at Behance in support of No Pasarán in the wake of the blog's outrageous treatment by Google. (Thanks for the Instalink, Sarah,and for the bump, Glenn.)

There are three posters at the moment, of which Beijing's Tien An Men Square one can be seen above. By all means, check out the two other posters. 

While asking that you click the (blue) appreciation button in the right margin, Damian Bennett — who was instrumental in penning A Request To Help Spread The Word On Google Banning the Blog "No Pasarán" in the first place — adds the following suggestion:

  • Consider sending the Bēhance link (https://www.behance.net/gallery/232690889/Restore-No-Pasaran) for this post to 5 friends or acquaintances who might have an interest and, if appropriate, asking they pass it along. Kind of late 90s chain-letter fun.
  • If you are on Truth Social, X (scil., Twitter), or FB, please consider a post about ¡NP!'s situation and include the Bēhance link. 
  • More background details of the whole kerfuffle here: 
    • Google: It Is Time to Restore a Blog — and its 14,000 Posts — That You Have Harbored Without Problems for Over Two Decades
    • Bill Maher suggests left-wing censorship is dead — except it isn't when leftists gratuitously destroy a blog of 20 years and 14,000 posts
    • Google's Blogger Ban of "No Pasarán" — Six Weeks After the Behemoth Eviscerated the Conservative Blog…
    • The Blog "No Pasarán" Has Been Locked and Removed; Google: Put an End to the Censorship 
    • Censorship: "NO PASARÁN" VS BLOGGER ET AL.
    • DEAR READERS — A Request To Help Spread The Word On Google Banning the Blog "No Pasarán" 

    Here are Damian Bennett's comments for the Tienanmen photo:

    TIME TO PICK A SIDE
    ...Be TANK MAN!​​​​​​​
    Picture credit: Jeff Widener/Associated Press

    A FREE ZIP of these RESTORE ¡NO PASARÁN! posters can be downloaded by clicking the download button at right. Please use and share posters to inform and raise awareness of ¡NO PASARÁN!’s plight. Posters (11"x17") are saved as JPGs at 300dpi. Need something smaller? A folder of half-size thumbs is included. Posters can only be used ‛as is’ and may NOT be altered with a political or organization affiliation or otherwise changed in any way. (Please read the ‘plain English’ usage license accompanying the files.)

    Why not start by going to X and re-posting the Behance call to arms?

    2025/08/31

    The politics of AI, writes Sébastien Laye, are quickly becoming a contest over regulation

    The politics of artificial intelligence are quickly becoming a contest over regulation, with lawmakers and agencies competing to demonstrate vigilance rather than focusing on enabling innovation.

    In The high price of regulating AI, Sébastien Laye publishes his latest op ed for Washington Examiner:

    The Senate’s decision to strip a decadelong federal moratorium on state AI rules from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act was a case in point. In one day, Washington, D.C., abandoned a pause that might have prevented a patchwork of 50 AI codes. The vote was to remove the moratorium provision after a late campaign against it; whatever one thinks of preemption, the “snafu” has left firms facing a thicket of overlapping mandates.

    Two economic lessons follow. 

    First, regulatory fragmentation is a tax on experimentation. The internet’s ascent owed much to a permissive, light-touch posture — anchored by policy choices like Section 230 and a general reluctance to pre-clear new services. That climate did not eliminate harm, but it lowered the fixed costs of entry so innovators could discover value before being strangled by procedure.

    The political economy of AI is now tilting the other way. …

     

     

    2025/08/30

    U.S. Republicans Join French Media Discussions on Ambassador Kushner's Open Letter to President Macron on Anti-Semitism (Videos)


    Among the ROF members who appeared on French media this week, both of them to discuss Ambassador Charles Kushner's open letter to President Macron, were Randy Yaloz (twice) and Nicolas Conquer. We haven't received the clips from i24 and Tocsin Media (yet), but in the meantime, here is the LCI program that discussed the American ambassador's criticism of anti-semitism in France.

    Paul Reen had this to say: 

    Bravo to Nicolas for his excellent appearance on LCI last night defending Amb Kushner's earlier 1 on 1 with Darius Rochebin. This is such a telling show with a number of unprecedented moments IMO.  Of course they don't give Nicolas the floor until after the 12:30 min giving the usual suspects ample time to fully criticize  the Ambassador “ for breaking protocol” and for daring to  criticize Macron for not doing enough to combat anti-semitism, basically called him a liar. 
     
    But it’s the unprecedented pushback and live fact-checking done by Darius’ replacement, Margot Haddad, on the sly Gallagher Fenwick that I found most unprecedented and shocking. First, he tries to claim that anti-semitic attacks in France are down 25% from last year, but she immediately counters him stating that they are still way up since Oct 7, 2023. Later, Fenwick tries to say that Trump has been lying that at Columbia Univ, Jewish students and faculty were blocked from entering the school.  Again Haddad steps in immediately to live fact-check this ridiculous claim, even showing that CNN reported on it (she is ex CNN).  Not saying that she is a right winger but it’s the first time I have seen LCI push back on one of their typical biased, lying anti-Trump, regular guests. Perhaps it’s because she is Franco-American, but finally good to see a host doing their job. Will she get reprimanded for it? We’ll see.
    During the U.S. ambassador's 1 on 1 with Darius Rochebin in the American embassy discussing whether America had interfered in the internal affairs of France, Charles Kushner pushed back by pointing out that by threatening to recognize Palestine, France has certainly interfered in the internal affairs of Israel. 
     
    Here is the LCI program video and below is its description: 

    Le 22h Haddad du jeudi 28 août 2025

    Publié le 29 août 2025 à 0h00

    Au sommaire : Antisémitisme : l'ambassadeur US accuse la France. Kiev frappée, Moscou n'en a pas fini avec la guerre. Poutine-Kim-XI : retrouvailles entre terreurs ?

    Source : 22h

     

    2025/08/28

    Censorship: "NO PASARÁN" VS BLOGGER ET AL.


    Today is a three-month anniversary: it has been exactly 3 months since one of the blogosphere's oldest blogs still in existence was suddenly and without warning eviscerated by Google. (Please make sure you read the paragraph in bold at the very bottom of this post…)

    After 21 years, the blog No Pasarán was unceremoniously locked, banned, removed, and cancelled by a member of Google's Blogger crew, without the courtesy of giving the slightest explanation why. Not just one single (allegedly) offending post reset to "draft status", mind you, but between 14,000 and 15,000 posts — 21 years' worth of patient writing and thorough reporting — removed and destroyed once and for all. 

    As I wrote in the latest of my four letters (so far) to Google CEO Sundar Pichai in California,

    Your cavalier treatment of my blog feels like taking one's car to a garage — a trustworthy garage that one has been a faithful customer to for two decades — only to have the head of the garage (or, rather, some unsupervised low-level mechanic) call back later and say, "No, we cannot repair the car and not only that, we are going to confiscate said vehicle and sell it off at auction." 

    Thank you to all who have taken an interest in the censure of No Pasarán. 

    As the valiant Trump White House fearlessly widens the fight to engage with the many enemies of the right, one after the other (which are really enemies of Western civilization), throughout the years and the decades — from the mainstream media and the deep state to PBS and the Smithsonian — my hope is that right-minded people and, indeed, American citizens of all stripes will join in fighting against what seems to be a primary example of yet another persistent foe, the unreconstructed leftist leaders of the Silicon Valley behemoths.

    If Google will do this against a relatively minor blog, whose heyday was admittedly in the early 20th century era of the blogosphere, then who will be next? (See the post "Bill Maher suggests left-wing censorship is dead — except it isn't when leftists gratuitously destroy a blog of 20+ years and 14,000 posts").

    Fight!

    Fight!

    Fight!

    Below is my brief against Google, which owns and services Blogger:

    1. On May 28, Blogger without notice or explanation CENSORED No Pasarán and de-platformed the 21-year-old blog.

    2. Blogger stated that No Pasarán "was flagged to us for review. We have determined that it violates our … Misleading Content Policy." Yet Blogger has never provided posts or language to example a single offense.

    3. Further after 21 years — TWENTY-ONE YEARS — and over 14,000 posts, Blogger asks us to believe only now has it suddenly discovered violations of its community guidelines (or, for that matter, any rules of common courtesy whatsoever) by No Pasarán, an exemplary Netizen. This is a ridiculous and insupportable fiction. 

    It is simply not credible.

    4. Blogger has responded — in the briefest of responses — to subsequent appeals with a single boilerplate reply or two signed by a rotation of fictitious "dedicated" customer "specialists" (some of who may be younger than the blog itself), at one point suggesting No Pasarán could pursue an appeal of Blogger's rejection of the previous appeal, that is, pursue an endless loop of appeals to rejected appeals.

    5. No Pasarán has been given no opportunities to confront the complainant(s), to know, much less address, any specific complaint(s) or offense(s), or to redress any valid offense.

    6. Blogger offers no resolution process to undo its censure of No Pasarán, giving the lie to its bad faith appeal process.

    7. No Pasarán's position is simple. It knows of no violation(s) committed. It DEMANDS reinstatement consistent with Blogger's own service pledges to its customers (e.g., "What you can expect from us").  See "the trusted garage" simile at the beginning of this post; I fully understand, and I have no bones with, the fact that in the United States the First Amendment cannot be used against private companies, only against governments on various levels.  But surely Google's injurious ban, along with its unwarranted destruction of 14,000 posts, is — at the very least — a breach of good faith and fair dealing.

    8. To the average reader, both within the U.S. and abroad, Google's sudden and unwarranted de-platforming of No Pasarán looks like nothing more than political censorship; nothing more than a member of the (in?)famously left-leaning member of Silicon Valley gratuitously censoring and unduly pestering a conservative citizen to the utmost of their ability. 

    Thank you for your interest and support. Please check back at Le Monde Watch for developments. If you would like to heed Donald Trump's words at Butler — Fight! Fight! FIght! — and join the fight to reinstate No Pasarán, please contact me directly at eriksvane@aol.com.

    DEAR READERS: Help spread the word! Sample text at the present link that can be used as inspiration for a letter or email to friends and family or various "influencers," whether politicians, reporters, podcasters, bloggers (!), or anyone with an interest.

    More details here: 
    • Google: It Is Time to Restore a Blog — and its 14,000 Posts — That You Have Harbored Without Problems for Over Two Decades
    • Bill Maher suggests left-wing censorship is dead — except it isn't when leftists gratuitously destroy a blog of 20 years and 14,000 posts
    • Google's Blogger Ban of "No Pasarán" — Six Weeks After the Behemoth Eviscerated the Conservative Blog…
    • The Blog "No Pasarán" Has Been Locked and Removed; Google: Put an End to the Censorship
    • BE TANK MAN! Join the Fight to "Restore No Pasarán" to the Blogosphere 
    • DEAR READERS — A Request To Help Spread The Word On Google Banning the Blog "No Pasarán" 
    • Censorship: "NO PASARÁN" VS BLOGGER ET AL.
    • Belgian government 
    • Powerline on the fate of the disappeared site No Pasarán: "Something out of a real life Biden-era horror movie"