2025/07/27

Remember Epstein's Bill Clinton Painting? The Main Talking Points of the Latest Epstein Affair

The article on the Main Talking Points of the Latest Epstein Affair follows reports on the guest appearances of three Paris-based Republicans on French TV and starts below the Youtube video.

On July 19 (a day after debating Democrats Abroad member Amy Porter on FranceinfoTV), Nicolas Conquer was invited to the BFMTV channel at 8:30 PM (4:10-18:48) to discuss the latest Epstein scandal. The ROF spokesman pointed out that if Donald Trump had known, or suspected, that his name was on the Epstein list, he would obviously never have made revealing the list a feature of his campaign to attract more voters… "Nicolas sets Laurence Haïm, and BFM Trump haters trying to claim that the GOP is broken, straight," writes Paul Reen, "with facts on the Trump-Epstein hysteria (they don’t listen needless to say)." 

Three days later, Nicolas Conquer appeared on BFMTV, for a discussion on Tulsi’s release of Obama files. Noting that the TV channel is playing the 1992 videos in a loop and seems "to be competing with LCI and others on who can play it the most often," ROF's Paul Reen comments: "Typical massive anti-trump bias for calling out 'saint' Obama who can do no harm. Trump called 'Obama obsessed', jealous, racist, a threat to democracy, even a pedo. Scandalous on the part of BFM. How dare he forward a funny AI video on Obama!! Nicolas did great remaining calm and firing facts, despite being remote and given far less time than others" 

Trump/Epstein : une relation embarrassante - 19/07

Dix milliards de dollars, c'est la somme d'argent que réclame le président américain au Wall Street Journal, qui porte plainte pour diffamation. Cela fait suite à la publication par le quotidien d'un message d'anniversaire qu'aurait adressé en 2003 Donald Trump à Jeffrey Epstein. On en parle avec : Nicolas Conquer, porte-parole de "Republican Overseas France". Laurence Haïm, journaliste spécialiste des États-Unis. Olivier Ravanello, consultant politique internationale BFMTV. Et Henry Arnaud, correspondant BFMTV à Los Angeles.
| Durée : 18:48  

Later that evening (of July 19th), John Lowe was a guest at another TV Channel, TF1's LCI channel at 22:30 PM (17:41-38:28). "In the face of 5-6 Trump haters implying that he’s probably a pedo," comments Paul Reen; a lawyer by trade, ROF's vice-president "did a good job trying to explain Pam Bondi’s reluctance to publicize info from a legal standpoint. Images from 1992 on loop of course," i.e., 13 years before Epstein's very first indictment. 

Le 22h Haddad du samedi 19 juillet 2025

Publié le 19 juillet 2025 à 22h13

Au sommaire : Algérie, la France doit-elle durcir le ton ? Ukraine, la cible d'une nouvelle attaque massive. Russie-Chine, l'Europe attaquée d'ici 2027 ? Le fantôme d'Epstein, cauchemar de Trump ?

Source : 22h 

On July 25, Erik Svane was a guest on BFMTV's BFM Soir at 11:35 PM (1:33:48-1:48:33) Notice how the French absolutely do not want to hear any mention of Democrat sins in the Epstein affair, especially the damning fact that Jeffrey Epstein had a painting of an American man dressed as as a woman. Given the fact that the blue dress he is wearing in the painting belonged to Monica Lewinsky, it is clear that the POTUS is not Donald Trump but Bill Clinton. Notice how the presenter keeps interrupting the ROF spokesman — "let's get back to the issue at hand!" — and, at the end, even starts wagging her fingers at him.

| BFM Soir

Émission du 25 juillet 2025

BFM Soir fait le tour des images marquantes et des déclarations fortes de la journée et fait vivre l’info du soir, entouré de chroniqueurs, d’invités et d’éditorialistes.
1h48min|2025|

Diffusée le 25 juillet 2025 à 22h00 sur BFM TV

Here are what I consider the main talking points of the Epstein affair.

The Main Talking Points of the Latest Epstein Affair 

Besides the fact that the (relatively rare) photos of Donald Trump with Jeffrey Epstein were taken in the 1990s, before the latter's very first indictment (2005), Trump cut ties with him before said indictment. 

In that perspective, there are far more photos of Epstein with such luminaries as Bill Clinton. Perhaps the most damning fact in favor of Trump that should invariably be mentioned in any debate is that if Jeffrey Epstein had a painting of an American VIP on a wall of his Manhattan mansion, it wasn't that of Donald Trump. Indeed, given the fact that the blue dress that the VIP — dressed as, wearing make-up as, and seductively posing as a woman — is wearing in the painting is supposed to be the one that once belonged to Monica Lewinsky (as are the VIP's shoes), it is clear that the POTUS in question is Bill Clinton.

There you have it. As it is highly visual, the Clinton painting is the main talking point to throw back in the face of the Democrats, and if you have no time for bring up more arguments to make a stronger case, that is the single most important one to bring up. Again, notice how, in the video above, when I try to mention such sins on the Democrats' side (5:44 & 6:11), the TV host starts interrupting me…

Beyond that, the question is not why the Trump administration is not releasing information about Jeffrey Epstein — as Democrats are now clamoring for. 

The more obvious question — certainly in view of the fact that the Dems are posing as honorable truth-seekers —is, why didn’t Joe Biden release the Epstein dossier for the four years that he was at the pinnacle of the government? And, indeed, why didn't Democrats clamor for the president — for one of their own party — to do so while the child-hair-sniffer (another feature more associated with the Epstein crowd) was in the White House? And if any Democrats had found Donald Trump‘s name on any list during their time in power, isn’t it obvious — after ten years of innumerable bogus indictments and sham lawsuits — that they would have released that  information? 

Do you know the name of Marcwayne Mullin? Everybody should have the name of the Senator from the Sooner State on their lips. Like with the French (notably, as we have seen, on their TV shows), the Epstein affair is all that America’s Democrats are talking about:

But: As it turns out, when the Oklahoma Republican called for the release of all files regarding this subject, it turned out to that democrats voted AGAINST it: “apparently, [Democrat] lawmakers were just joshing about that whole “transparency” thing. They didn’t really want the White House to release the documents. Otherwise, they would have fully supported Mullins’ resolution.”  

So Why Is the Left Desperate to Turn Jeffrey Epstein into a Trump Scandal? 

 … it’s painfully obvious what’s going on. The media’s desperate attempts to link Trump to Epstein aren’t based on facts—they’re based on fear. Fear of what might happen if the real truth about Epstein’s client list ever comes to light. Fear of who might be exposed. Fear that the public will finally see just how deep the rot goes—and that it overwhelmingly runs through their side of the aisle. 

So instead, they keep recycling half-baked stories, grasping at birthday cards and blurry associations, hoping something—anything—will stick to Trump. 

But it won’t. Because the facts are clear: Trump cut ties with Epstein long before it was politically convenient. Meanwhile, powerful Democrats wined and dined with him for years. That’s the story the media refuses to tell—and that’s exactly why they’re working overtime to distract you. 

Do not allow the French media's (or the American media's) obsession with the Epstein scandal hide the fact that the main reason the Democrats are so obsessed with it is that it is a distraction from what is the real scandal right now: Tulsi Gabbard‘s unearthing of the Russia hoax, in which none other than Barack Obama himself got just about everybody in his entourage and in the government to lie in 2016-2017 about the bogus theory (begun, indeed, by none other than themselves) of Donald Trump‘s being an agent of the Kremlin. This, indeed, is far far worse than the Watergate scandal of 50 years ago…

 

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)